Unstable approach — CFR93

68CA · 15

2026-07-06 00:03 UTC· KRDD 68CA· USDA FOREST SERVICE FEPP, CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FORESTRY & FIRE PRO· S2T

CFR93 (Usda Forest Service Fepp) was operating from KRDD to 68CA on 2026-07-06. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Lake California Air Park (68CA) on runway 15 at 00:03 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1700 ft AGL, 124 kt GS. Approach stability score: 33/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 15
  • 1700 ft AGL at event
  • 124 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 33/100
  • 7 kt wind
  • 1 kt crosswind component

Flight context

  • CFR93
  • Usda Forest Service Fepp
  • S2T
  • KRDD → 68CA
  • 2026-07-06 00:03 UTC
  • 68CA runway 15

All events on this flight

Unstable approach 00:03:42 UTC · 68CA runway 15 · 1,700 ft AGL · 124 kt GS
Long landing rollout 00:10:12 UTC · 68CA runway 15 · 515 ft AGL · 9 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· 68CA