EJA691 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KSTP to KBZN (Gallatin Field) on 2026-01-11. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Flying Cloud Airport (KFCM) on runway 10R at 19:30 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL409, turnaround area near Clear Creek, US. Approach stability score: 69/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 10 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY5/0601 2025-11-30 19:00Z – 2026-05-31 18:59Z SFC–400 ft

    Los Angeles, CA, Sunday, November 30, 2025 through Sunday, May 31, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 10R
  • 898 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 69/100
  • 10 kt wind
  • 10 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • METAR KFCM 131753Z 27004KT 10SM OVC023 13/08 A2993 RMK AO2 SLP138 T01280078 10128 20111 53003

Flight context

  • EJA691
  • Netjets Sales
  • C68A
  • KSTP → KLAX
  • 2026-01-11 19:30 UTC
  • KFCM runway 10R

All events on this flight

Diversion 19:30:16 UTC · KFCM runway 10R · 898 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 19:30:16 UTC · KFCM runway 10R · 898 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 19:30:16 UTC · KFCM runway 10R · 898 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 19:30:16 UTC · KFCM runway 10R · 898 ft AGL · 120 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KFCM