Long landing rollout — N331AX
KCMA · 262026-03-27 19:35 UTC· KNTD → KCMA· HUNTER AVIATION INTERNATIONAL INC· HUNT
N331AX (Hunter Aviation International) was operating from KNTD to KCMA on 2026-03-27. SkyMeter detected a long landing rollout at Camarillo Airport (KCMA) on runway 26 at 19:35 UTC. Trace data at the event: 55 ft AGL, 10 kt GS, 0 fpm vertical. Approach stability score: 79/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 8 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A long landing rollout is detected when ground deceleration after touchdown is below the per-runway P10 envelope. It is an observational measure of rollout efficiency, not a runway-exit incident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/0601 2025-11-30 19:00Z – 2026-05-31 18:59Z SFC–400 ft
Los Angeles, CA, Sunday, November 30, 2025 through Sunday, May 31, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 26
- 55 ft AGL at event
- 10 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 79/100
- 10 kt wind
- 8 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KCMA 230055Z 25007KT 10SM CLR 22/17 A2983 RMK AO2 SLP110 T02220167
Flight context
- N331AX
- Hunter Aviation International
- HUNT
- KNTD → KCMA
- 2026-03-27 19:35 UTC
- KCMA runway 26
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data