Diversion — EJA780

KTMB · 09R

2026-03-09 21:59 UTC· KILG → KTMB· NETJETS SALES INC, NETJETS AVIATION INC· CL35

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA780 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KILG to KPDK (DeKalb Peachtree Airport) on 2026-03-09. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Miami Executive Airport (KTMB) on runway 09R at 21:59 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL448, turnaround area near Oak Island, US. Approach stability score: 74/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 2 kt crosswind component. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY5/2809 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–2,000 ft

    Palm Beach, FL, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • SECURITY5/2858 2025-12-26 04:59Z – 2026-07-02 03:59Z SFC–1,000 ft

    OCHOPPEE, FL, Thursday, December 25, 2025 through Wednesday, July 1, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 09R
  • 8 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 74/100
  • 7 kt wind
  • 2 kt crosswind component
  • METAR KTMB 281553Z AUTO A2998 RMK AO2 SLP153 PWINO TSNO $

Flight context

  • EJA780
  • Netjets Sales
  • CL35
  • KILG → KTMB
  • 2026-03-09 21:59 UTC
  • KTMB runway 09R

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KTMB