Diversion — EJA389

KMDW · 13C

2026-02-25 15:28 UTC· KHPN → KMDW· NETJETS SALES INC· C680

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA389 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KHPN to KCHS (Charleston Air Force Base-International Airport) on 2026-02-25. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Chicago Midway International Airport (KMDW) on runway 13C at 15:28 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL420, turnaround area near McDonald, US. Approach stability score: 91/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft

    NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 13C
  • 612 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 91/100
  • 10 kt wind
  • 4 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KMDW 041453Z 32005KT 10SM CLR 18/10 A3015 RMK AO2 SLP206 T01780100 51008

Flight context

  • EJA389
  • Netjets Sales
  • C680
  • KHPN → KMDW
  • 2026-02-25 15:28 UTC
  • KMDW runway 13C

All events on this flight

Diversion 15:28:35 UTC · KMDW runway 13C · 612 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 15:28:35 UTC · KMDW runway 13L · 612 ft AGL · 120 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KMDW