Diversion — EJA797
KMIA · 08L2026-02-08 16:06 UTC· KIAD → KMIA· NETJETS SALES INC, BANK OF UTAH TRUSTEE, RUNSTAD JUDITH M, K & S· CL35
EJA797 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KIAD to KRDU (Raleigh Durham International Airport) on 2026-02-08. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Miami International Airport (KMIA) on runway 08L at 16:06 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL417, turnaround area near Georgetown, US. Approach stability score: 86/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 8 kt wind, 5 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/2809 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–2,000 ft
Palm Beach, FL, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY5/2858 2025-12-26 04:59Z – 2026-07-02 03:59Z SFC–1,000 ft
OCHOPPEE, FL, Thursday, December 25, 2025 through Wednesday, July 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 08L
- 8 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 86/100
- 8 kt wind
- 5 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KMIA 090253Z 17003KT 10SM FEW030 FEW250 28/24 A2993 RMK AO2 SLP136 T02830244 51013 $
Flight context
- EJA797
- Netjets Sales
- CL35
- KIAD → KMIA
- 2026-02-08 16:06 UTC
- KMIA runway 08L
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data