Go-around — POE627
KAUS · 18R2026-05-25 20:53 UTC· CYYZ → KAUS· Porter Airlines (Canada) Limited· E295
POE627 (Porter Airlines (Canada)) was operating from CYYZ to KAUS on 2026-05-25. SkyMeter detected a go-around at Austin Bergstrom International Airport (KAUS) on runway 18R at 20:53 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1538 ft AGL, 173 kt GS. METAR at the time reported 3 kt wind, 16,093 m visibility. A go-around is a discontinued landing approach in which the pilot adds power and climbs back to a safe altitude before re-attempting the approach or proceeding to an alternate. It is a routine safety response, not an emergency, and is taught as the standard reaction to any unstable approach. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/2036 2026-05-22 05:00Z – 2026-05-27 09:30Z SFC–17,999 ft
Macon, GA, Friday, May 22, 2026 through Wednesday, May 27, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/2330 2026-05-23 05:00Z – 2026-05-27 09:30Z SFC–17,999 ft
Macon, GA, Saturday, May 23, 2026 through Wednesday, May 27, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 18R
- 1538 ft AGL at event
- 173 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- 3 kt wind
- 0 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KAUS 200350Z AUTO 16010KT 10SM FEW080 29/20 A2993 RMK T02900200 MADISHF
Flight context
- POE627
- Porter Airlines (Canada)
- E295
- CYYZ → KAUS
- 2026-05-25 20:53 UTC
- KAUS runway 18R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data