Unstable approach — EJA941
KBUF · 322026-06-01 13:51 UTC· KTEB → KBUF· BLUE HILL CONNECTION LLC, CRANK IT UP LLC, D SHELLY GROUP INC, E· C68A
EJA941 (Blue Hill Connection) was operating from KTEB to KBUF on 2026-06-01. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Buffalo Niagara International Airport (KBUF) on runway 32 at 13:51 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1838 ft AGL, 137 kt GS. Approach stability score: 41/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 6 kt wind, 6 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Pilot review data
- Runway 32
- 1838 ft AGL at event
- 137 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 41/100
- 6 kt wind
- 6 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KBUF 161754Z 26018G25KT 10SM SCT021 OVC110 16/12 A2971 RMK AO2 PK WND 28031/1702 RAE1659B27E38 SLP060 P0000 60049 T01610117 10206 20161 51026 $
Flight context
- EJA941
- Blue Hill Connection
- C68A
- KTEB → KBUF
- 2026-06-01 13:51 UTC
- KBUF runway 32
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data