Long landing rollout — EJA885

KCCR · 19R

2026-08-05 19:21 UTC· KSJC → KCCR· TEXTRON AVIATION INC· C700

EJA885 (Textron Aviation) was operating from KSJC to KCCR on 2026-08-05. SkyMeter detected a long landing rollout at Buchanan Field (KCCR) on runway 19R at 19:21 UTC. Trace data at the event: 22 ft AGL, 0 kt GS, 0 fpm vertical. Approach stability score: 89/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 5 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A long landing rollout is detected when ground deceleration after touchdown is below the per-runway P10 envelope. It is an observational measure of rollout efficiency, not a runway-exit incident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY6/6491 2026-07-20 07:01Z – 2026-09-16 06:59Z SFC–1,499 ft

    Concord, CA, Monday, July 20, 2026 through Tuesday, September 15, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 19R
  • 22 ft AGL at event
  • 0 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 89/100
  • 5 kt wind
  • 4 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • METAR KCCR 271753Z 19011KT 10SM FEW070 BKN100 BKN110 18/12 A2990 RMK AO2 SLP111 T01830117 10183 20144 53005 $

Flight context

  • EJA885
  • Textron Aviation
  • C700
  • KSJC → KCCR
  • 2026-08-05 19:21 UTC
  • KCCR runway 19R

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KCCR