Diversion — EAL8270
KAUS · 18R2026-04-20 10:58 UTC· KIWA → KAUS· EASTERN AIRLINES LLC· B763
EAL8270 (Eastern Airlines) was operating from KIWA to KHRL (Valley International Airport) on 2026-04-20. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Austin Bergstrom International Airport (KAUS) on runway 18R at 10:58 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL345, turnaround area near Presidio County, US. Approach stability score: 84/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/4165 2026-02-14 07:00Z – 2026-08-15 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Nogales, AZ, Saturday, February 14, 2026 through Friday, August 14, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4240 2026-03-08 08:00Z – 2026-11-01 07:00Z SFC–180 ft
SAN ANGELO, TX, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 18R
- 488 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 84/100
- 7 kt wind
- 0 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KAUS 202153Z 14005KT 10SM SCT070 BKN300 36/18 A2983 RMK AO2 SLP087 T03560178 $
Flight context
- EAL8270
- Eastern Airlines
- B763
- KIWA → KAUS
- 2026-04-20 10:58 UTC
- KAUS runway 18R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data