Diversion — LXJ514

KHTO · 10

2026-07-24 20:41 UTC· KORD → KHTO· BANKS LEE C TRUSTEE, TVPX AIRCRAFT SOLUTIONS INC TRUSTEE, WAITE · CL35

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

LXJ514 (Banks LEE C) was operating from KORD to KBOS (General Edward Lawrence Logan International Airport) on 2026-07-24. SkyMeter detected a diversion to East Hampton Airport (KHTO) on runway 10 at 20:41 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL471, turnaround area near Cambridge Springs, US. Approach stability score: 46/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 8 kt crosswind component. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/6522 2026-07-24 17:30Z – 2026-07-27 04:00Z SFC–400 ft

    chicago, IL, Friday, July 24, 2026 through Monday, July 27, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • SECURITY6/6759 2026-07-24 20:00Z – 2026-07-26 04:00Z SFC–400 ft

    Ann Arbor, MI, Friday, July 24, 2026 through Sunday, July 26, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 10
  • 31 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 46/100
  • 10 kt wind
  • 8 kt crosswind component

Flight context

  • LXJ514
  • Banks LEE C
  • CL35
  • KORD → KHTO
  • 2026-07-24 20:41 UTC
  • KHTO runway 10

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KHTO