Diversion — EJA841
KBED · 052026-03-22 18:33 UTC· KOPF → KBED· TT3 PARTNERS FO LLC, SHEEHAN ANDREW, ARBOR INVESTMENTS MANAGEMEN· C700
EJA841 (TT3 Partners FO) was operating from KOPF to KOWD (Norwood Memorial Airport) on 2026-03-22. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Laurence G Hanscom Field (KBED) on runway 05 at 18:33 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL425, turnaround area near Buxton, US. Approach stability score: 85/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 3 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/2809 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–2,000 ft
Palm Beach, FL, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft
NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 05
- 128 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 85/100
- 10 kt wind
- 3 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KBED 251451Z 04015G20KT 10SM CLR 16/08 A3020 RMK AO2 SLP241 T01610078 56006 $
Flight context
- EJA841
- TT3 Partners FO
- C700
- KOPF → KBED
- 2026-03-22 18:33 UTC
- KBED runway 05
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data