Diversion — EJA631
KAPF · 052026-04-04 16:49 UTC· KFRG → KAPF· NETJETS SALES INC, BDT CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, CAESARS ENTERTAINME· C68A
EJA631 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KFRG to KOAJ (Albert J Ellis Airport) on 2026-04-04. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Naples Municipal Airport (KAPF) on runway 05 at 16:49 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL414, turnaround area near Surf City, US. Approach stability score: 30/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 6 kt wind, 6 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/2809 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–2,000 ft
Palm Beach, FL, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft
NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 05
- 8 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 30/100
- 6 kt wind
- 6 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KAPF 231253Z 12008KT 10SM CLR 27/24 A2996 RMK AO2 SLP142 T02670244
Flight context
- EJA631
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KFRG → KAPF
- 2026-04-04 16:49 UTC
- KAPF runway 05
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data