Rejected takeoff — EJA394

KIAD · 01R

2026-07-24 02:07 UTC· KIAD → KTPA· NETJETS SALES INC, PASTRICK COURTNEY CLARK, PASTRICK ROBERT SCOT· E55P

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA394 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KIAD to KTPA on 2026-07-24. SkyMeter detected a rejectedtakeoff at Washington Dulles International Airport (KIAD) on runway 01R at 02:07 UTC. Trace data at the event: 272 ft AGL, 61 kt GS, 0 fpm vertical. METAR at the time reported 4 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • HAZARDS6/6848 2026-07-20 00:32Z – 2026-08-03 23:45Z SFC–3,000 ft

    2NM W SHULERVILLE, SC, Monday, July 20, 2026 through Monday, August 3, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • SECURITY6/6747 2026-07-20 12:30Z – 2026-07-24 06:00Z SFC–2,500 ft

    MAYPORT, FL, Monday, July 20, 2026 through Friday, July 24, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/6412 2026-07-23 18:00Z – 2026-07-24 03:59Z SFC–400 ft

    Raleigh, NC, Thursday, July 23, 2026 through Friday, July 24, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 01R
  • 272 ft AGL at event
  • 61 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • 4 kt wind
  • 4 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KIAD 162252Z 17006KT 10SM CLR 27/19 A3028 RMK AO2 SLP250 T02670189

Flight context

  • EJA394
  • Netjets Sales
  • E55P
  • KIAD → KTPA
  • 2026-07-24 02:07 UTC
  • KIAD runway 01R

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KIAD