Diversion — EJA862

KAGC · 10

2026-03-15 13:44 UTC· KHPN → KAGC· GREYSPACE HOLDINGS LLC, EPKER ARTHUR III, HENNELLY DANIEL, HENNE· C700

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA862 (Greyspace Holdings) was operating from KHPN to KAGC (Allegheny County Airport) on 2026-03-15. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Allegheny County Airport (KAGC) on runway 10 at 13:44 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL283, turnaround area near Selinsgrove, US. Approach stability score: 70/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 15 kt wind, 14 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft

    NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 10
  • 1250 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 70/100
  • 15 kt wind
  • 14 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • METAR KAGC 270253Z 35009G18KT 10SM CLR 16/09 A3002 RMK AO2 SLP168 T01560089 50003

Flight context

  • EJA862
  • Greyspace Holdings
  • C700
  • KHPN → KAGC
  • 2026-03-15 13:44 UTC
  • KAGC runway 10

All events on this flight

Diversion 13:44:08 UTC · KAGC runway 10 · 1,250 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 13:44:08 UTC · KAGC runway 10 · 1,250 ft AGL · 120 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KAGC