Rejected takeoff — EJA605
KBJC · 032026-06-14 18:42 UTC· KBJC → KMCW· NETJETS SALES INC, WL-DG LLC, BRAMCO INC, JOHNSON DAVID L, EO CO· C68A
EJA605 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KBJC to KMCW on 2026-06-14. SkyMeter detected a rejectedtakeoff at Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (KBJC) on runway 03 at 18:42 UTC. Trace data at the event: 5574 ft AGL, 122 kt GS. Approach stability score: 78/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 11 kt wind, 6 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- HAZARDS6/7480 2026-06-11 12:00Z – 2026-06-23 03:00Z SFC–9,500 ft
24NM SW CHADRON, NE, Thursday, June 11, 2026 through Tuesday, June 23, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/5706 2026-06-11 14:00Z – 2026-06-23 04:00Z SFC–400 ft
Omaha, NE, Thursday, June 11, 2026 through Tuesday, June 23, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 03
- 5574 ft AGL at event
- 122 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 78/100
- 11 kt wind
- 6 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KBJC 161845Z 03014KT 10SM FEW080 BKN120 25/07 A3028
Flight context
- EJA605
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KBJC → KMCW
- 2026-06-14 18:42 UTC
- KBJC runway 03
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data