Diversion — EJA910
KIDA · 022026-03-13 14:58 UTC· KHOU → KIDA· BEARS AIR LLC, COLMENA SKY LLC, SIMPSON GARY, GB LONGITUDE LLC, · C68A
EJA910 (Bears AIR) was operating from KHOU to KJAC (Jackson Hole Airport) on 2026-03-13. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Idaho Falls Regional Airport (KIDA) on runway 02 at 14:58 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL441, turnaround area near Union County, US. Approach stability score: 93/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 27 kt wind, 6 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/4165 2026-02-14 07:00Z – 2026-08-15 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Nogales, AZ, Saturday, February 14, 2026 through Friday, August 14, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4240 2026-03-08 08:00Z – 2026-11-01 07:00Z SFC–180 ft
SAN ANGELO, TX, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 02
- 4731 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 93/100
- 27 kt wind
- 6 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KIDA 270853Z AUTO 36005KT 10SM FEW065 FEW095 BKN110 11/04 A3010 RMK AO2 RAB36E48 SLP165 P0000 60000 T01060044 55001
Flight context
- EJA910
- Bears AIR
- C68A
- KHOU → KIDA
- 2026-03-13 14:58 UTC
- KIDA runway 02
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data