Unstable approach — PWR8

KMDW · 22L

2026-05-04 22:54 UTC· KPIT → KMDW· BRASK T-4 EQUIPMENT LLC· C680

PWR8 (Brask T-4 Equipment) was operating from KPIT to KMDW on 2026-05-04. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Chicago Midway International Airport (KMDW) on runway 22L at 22:54 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1727 ft AGL, 107 kt GS. Approach stability score: 57/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 2 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 22L
  • 1727 ft AGL at event
  • 107 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 57/100
  • 10 kt wind
  • 2 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KMDW 131153Z 34010KT 10SM OVC023 03/M02 A3000 RMK AO2 SLP164 60000 T00331022 10044 20033 53007

Flight context

  • PWR8
  • Brask T-4 Equipment
  • C680
  • KPIT → KMDW
  • 2026-05-04 22:54 UTC
  • KMDW runway 22L

All events on this flight

Unstable approach 22:54:55 UTC · KMDW runway 22L · 1,727 ft AGL · 107 kt GS
Unstable approach 22:54:55 UTC · KMDW runway 22L · 1,727 ft AGL · 107 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KMDW