Long landing rollout — LXJ505
KBFM · 322026-02-22 22:06 UTC· KBZN → KBFM· CWIERNTNIA MATTHEW DOW, GRAVES SCOTT, CHALLENGER 350 2019 LLC, F· CL35
LXJ505 (Cwierntnia Matthew DOW) was operating from KBZN to KBFM on 2026-02-22. SkyMeter detected a long landing rollout at Mobile Downtown Airport (KBFM) on runway 32 at 22:06 UTC. Trace data at the event: 49 ft AGL, 12 kt GS, 0 fpm vertical. Approach stability score: 58/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 16 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A long landing rollout is detected when ground deceleration after touchdown is below the per-runway P10 envelope. It is an observational measure of rollout efficiency, not a runway-exit incident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/4165 2026-02-14 07:00Z – 2026-08-15 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Nogales, AZ, Saturday, February 14, 2026 through Friday, August 14, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 32
- 49 ft AGL at event
- 12 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 58/100
- 16 kt wind
- 4 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KBFM 241653Z 05005KT 10SM SCT015 BKN024 28/23 A3007 RMK AO2 SLP183 T02830233
Flight context
- LXJ505
- Cwierntnia Matthew DOW
- CL35
- KBZN → KBFM
- 2026-02-22 22:06 UTC
- KBFM runway 32
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data