Diversion — EJA809
KOAK · 10L2026-07-28 21:26 UTC· KCRQ → KOAK· NETJETS SALES INC, BARRY AMY B TRUSTEE, ERIE AIR LLC, MARIO ERNE· C700
EJA809 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KCRQ to KMDW (Chicago Midway International Airport) on 2026-07-28. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Metropolitan Oakland International Airport (KOAK) on runway 10L at 21:26 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL424, turnaround area near Buttonwillow, US. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 7 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- HAZARDS6/7246 2026-07-21 05:00Z – 2026-08-21 03:00Z SFC–10,500 ft
20NM N INDEPENDENCE, CA, Tuesday, July 21, 2026 through Friday, August 21, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/7372 2026-07-21 13:38Z – 2026-08-22 03:00Z SFC–10,500 ft
20NM N INDEPENDENCE, CA, Tuesday, July 21, 2026 through Saturday, August 22, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/7909 2026-07-22 18:11Z – 2026-08-08 04:00Z SFC–12,500 ft
20NM N INDEPENDENCE, CA, Wednesday, July 22, 2026 through Saturday, August 8, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 10L
- 6 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- 7 kt wind
- 7 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KOAK 170753Z 24009KT 10SM FEW006 SCT014 BKN027 17/14 A3001 RMK AO2 SLP160 T01720139 401890156
Flight context
- EJA809
- Netjets Sales
- C700
- KCRQ → KOAK
- 2026-07-28 21:26 UTC
- KOAK runway 10L
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data