Go-around — EJA686
KCRQ · 242026-02-14 20:01 UTC· KSDM → KCRQ· NETJETS SALES INC· C56X
EJA686 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KSDM to KCRQ on 2026-02-14. SkyMeter detected a go-around at Mc Clellan-Palomar Airport (KCRQ) on runway 24 at 20:01 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1097 ft AGL, 132 kt GS. METAR at the time reported 5 kt wind, 3 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A go-around is a discontinued landing approach in which the pilot adds power and climbs back to a safe altitude before re-attempting the approach or proceeding to an alternate. It is a routine safety response, not an emergency, and is taught as the standard reaction to any unstable approach. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/0601 2025-11-30 19:00Z – 2026-05-31 18:59Z SFC–400 ft
Los Angeles, CA, Sunday, November 30, 2025 through Sunday, May 31, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4160 2026-02-14 08:00Z – 2026-08-15 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Chula Vista, CA, Saturday, February 14, 2026 through Friday, August 14, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 24
- 1097 ft AGL at event
- 132 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- 5 kt wind
- 3 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KCRQ 231553Z 21004KT 10SM SCT009 21/18 A2986 RMK AO2 SLP110 T02060178
Flight context
- EJA686
- Netjets Sales
- C56X
- KSDM → KCRQ
- 2026-02-14 20:01 UTC
- KCRQ runway 24
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data