Diversion — EJA393

KBNA · 13

2026-03-11 20:43 UTC· KRDU → KBNA· NETJETS SALES INC, HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC, RIEPE JAMES S, NRC HO· E55P

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA393 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KRDU to KAVL (Asheville Regional Airport) on 2026-03-11. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Nashville International Airport (KBNA) on runway 13 at 20:43 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL353, turnaround area near Madison County, US. Approach stability score: 43/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 4 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 13
  • 577 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 43/100
  • 4 kt wind
  • 4 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • METAR KBNA 271253Z 05007KT 10SM SCT160 SCT250 17/08 A3005 RMK AO2 SLP171 T01670083 $

Flight context

  • EJA393
  • Netjets Sales
  • E55P
  • KRDU → KBNA
  • 2026-03-11 20:43 UTC
  • KBNA runway 13

All events on this flight

Diversion 20:43:02 UTC · KBNA runway 13 · 577 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 20:43:02 UTC · KBNA runway 13 · 577 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Unstable approach 20:38:37 UTC · KBNA runway 31 · 1,701 ft AGL · 111 kt GS
Unstable approach 20:38:37 UTC · KBNA runway 31 · 1,701 ft AGL · 111 kt GS
Diversion 20:43:02 UTC · KBNA runway 13 · 577 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 20:43:02 UTC · KBNA runway 13 · 577 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Unstable approach 20:38:37 UTC · KBNA runway 31 · 1,701 ft AGL · 111 kt GS
Unstable approach 20:38:37 UTC · KBNA runway 31 · 1,701 ft AGL · 111 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KBNA