Diversion — EJA690
KAUS · 18L2026-03-18 21:09 UTC· KLAS → KAUS· NETJETS SALES INC, E I MICROCIRCUITS INC, GLOBE FINANCIAL CORP, · C68A
EJA690 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KLAS to KAUS (Austin Bergstrom International Airport) on 2026-03-18. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Austin Bergstrom International Airport (KAUS) on runway 18L at 21:09 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL430, turnaround area near Tularosa, US. METAR at the time reported 8 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/0092 2026-01-04 00:01Z – 2026-07-04 23:59Z SFC–500 ft
CALEXICO, CA, Saturday, January 3, 2026 through Saturday, July 4, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4165 2026-02-14 07:00Z – 2026-08-15 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Nogales, AZ, Saturday, February 14, 2026 through Friday, August 14, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4240 2026-03-08 08:00Z – 2026-11-01 07:00Z SFC–180 ft
SAN ANGELO, TX, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 18L
- 474 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- 8 kt wind
- 1 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KAUS 251453Z 08003KT 10SM SCT020 BKN120 BKN250 28/23 A3009 RMK AO2 SLP177 T02830233 53004 $
Flight context
- EJA690
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KLAS → KAUS
- 2026-03-18 21:09 UTC
- KAUS runway 18L
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data