Diversion — EJA397
KLAS · 08R2026-04-15 20:22 UTC· KEUG → KLAS· NETJETS SALES INC· C680
EJA397 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KEUG to KHJO (Hanford Municipal Airport) on 2026-04-15. SkyMeter detected a diversion to McCarran International Airport (KLAS) on runway 08R at 20:22 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL393, turnaround area near Lander, US. Approach stability score: 76/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 9 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/3475 2026-03-08 09:00Z – 2026-11-01 09:59Z SFC–180 ft
BEALE AFB, CA, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/5797 2026-04-03 00:01Z – 2026-09-28 23:59Z SFC–400 ft
SACRAMENTO, CA, Thursday, April 2, 2026 through Monday, September 28, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 08R
- 2048 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 76/100
- 10 kt wind
- 9 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KLAS 211256Z 00000KT 10SM SCT110 BKN200 25/M01 A2992 RMK AO2 SLP103 T02501006
Flight context
- EJA397
- Netjets Sales
- C680
- KEUG → KLAS
- 2026-04-15 20:22 UTC
- KLAS runway 08R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data