Diversion — EJA953
KLBB · 082026-03-09 19:29 UTC· KFLL → KLBB· GREAT SOUTH BAY LLC, ADAMCZYK DARIUS, GYPSY ROSE AVIATION LLC, S· C68A
EJA953 (Great South BAY) was operating from KFLL to KMSY (Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport) on 2026-03-09. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Lubbock Preston Smith International Airport (KLBB) on runway 08 at 19:29 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL449, turnaround area near Thibodaux, US. Approach stability score: 70/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 13 kt wind, 5 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/6914 2025-05-06 23:30Z – 2027-10-18 11:03Z SFC–6,000 ft
South Padre Island, TX, Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4240 2026-03-08 08:00Z – 2026-11-01 07:00Z SFC–180 ft
SAN ANGELO, TX, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 08
- 3255 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 70/100
- 13 kt wind
- 5 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KLBB 281353Z 03006KT 10SM BKN250 19/16 A3003 RMK AO2 SLP129 T01890156
Flight context
- EJA953
- Great South BAY
- C68A
- KFLL → KLBB
- 2026-03-09 19:29 UTC
- KLBB runway 08
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data