Go-around — UAL1913

KPSC · 30

2026-05-16 03:54 UTC· KDEN KPSC· UNITED AIRLINES INC· A320

UAL1913 (United Airlines) was operating from KDEN to KPSC on 2026-05-16. SkyMeter detected a go-around at Tri Cities Airport (KPSC) on runway 30 at 03:54 UTC. Trace data at the event: 597 ft AGL, 135 kt GS. METAR at the time reported 11 kt wind, 5 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A go-around is a discontinued landing approach in which the pilot adds power and climbs back to a safe altitude before re-attempting the approach or proceeding to an alternate. It is a routine safety response, not an emergency, and is taught as the standard reaction to any unstable approach. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • HAZARDS6/9216 2026-05-11 12:00Z – 2026-05-26 02:00Z SFC–9,000 ft

    51NM SW BILLINGS, MT, Monday, May 11, 2026 through Tuesday, May 26, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 30
  • 597 ft AGL at event
  • 135 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • 11 kt wind
  • 5 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KPSC 201053Z AUTO 34004KT 10SM CLR 09/08 A3004 RMK AO2 SLP171 T00890083 $

Flight context

  • UAL1913
  • United Airlines
  • A320
  • KDEN → KPSC
  • 2026-05-16 03:54 UTC
  • KPSC runway 30

All events on this flight

Go-around 03:54:37 UTC · KPSC runway 30 · 597 ft AGL · 135 kt GS
Go-around 03:54:37 UTC · KPSC runway 30 · 597 ft AGL · 135 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KPSC