Unstable approach — MNL5

KTWF · 26

2026-07-04 14:28 UTC· KRNO KTWF· PILATUS BUSINESS AIRCRAFT LTD· F2TH

MNL5 (Pilatus Business Aircraft) was operating from KRNO to KTWF on 2026-07-04. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Joslin Field Magic Valley Regional Airport (KTWF) on runway 26 at 14:28 UTC. Trace data at the event: 5203 ft AGL, 123 kt GS. Approach stability score: 34/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 3 kt wind, 3 kt crosswind component, 14,484 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 26
  • 5203 ft AGL at event
  • 123 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 34/100
  • 3 kt wind
  • 3 kt crosswind component
  • 14,484 m visibility
  • KTWF 170653Z AUTO 18010G32KT 9SM -RA SCT023 SCT070 OVC095 19/10 A3002 RMK AO2 PK WND 20051/0629 LTG DSNT N AND NE RAE05B37 TSE10 SLP111 P0001 T01890100 402890061

Flight context

  • MNL5
  • Pilatus Business Aircraft
  • F2TH
  • KRNO → KTWF
  • 2026-07-04 14:28 UTC
  • KTWF runway 26

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KTWF