EJA562 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KAUS to KDAL (Dallas Love Field) on 2026-03-12. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Yampa Valley Airport (KHDN) on runway 10 at 23:32 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL411, turnaround area near Vega, US. Approach stability score: 58/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 16 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY6/4240 2026-03-08 08:00Z – 2026-11-01 07:00Z SFC–180 ft

    SAN ANGELO, TX, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 10
  • 6602 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 58/100
  • 16 kt wind
  • 4 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • METAR KHDN 272156Z AUTO 33006KT 10SM CLR 23/04 A3017 RMK AO2 SLP146 T02330039 PNO $

Flight context

  • EJA562
  • Netjets Sales
  • C68A
  • KAUS → KHDN
  • 2026-03-12 23:32 UTC
  • KHDN runway 10

All events on this flight

Diversion 23:32:19 UTC · KHDN runway 10 · 6,602 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 23:32:19 UTC · KHDN runway 10 · 6,602 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 23:32:19 UTC · KHDN runway 10 · 6,602 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 23:32:19 UTC · KHDN runway 10 · 6,602 ft AGL · 120 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KHDN