Diversion — EJA532
KBFI · 14R2026-03-22 22:36 UTC· KFTW → KBFI· NETJETS SALES INC, AIRGUS CORP, B&J LLC, EXCEL LLC, GREAT COUNTR· C68A
EJA532 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KFTW to KTWF (Joslin Field Magic Valley Regional Airport) on 2026-03-22. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Boeing Field King County International Airport (KBFI) on runway 14R at 22:36 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL462, turnaround area near Ballard, US. Approach stability score: 86/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 8 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 11,265 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/0601 2025-11-30 19:00Z – 2026-05-31 18:59Z SFC–400 ft
Los Angeles, CA, Sunday, November 30, 2025 through Sunday, May 31, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/3475 2026-03-08 09:00Z – 2026-11-01 09:59Z SFC–180 ft
BEALE AFB, CA, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 14R
- 21 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 86/100
- 8 kt wind
- 1 kt crosswind component
- 11,265 m visibility
- METAR KBFI 251253Z 00000KT 7SM BKN004 OVC075 13/12 A2966 RMK AO2 SLP043 T01330122
Flight context
- EJA532
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KFTW → KBFI
- 2026-03-22 22:36 UTC
- KBFI runway 14R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data