Long landing rollout — EJA560
KTRI · 232026-07-22 14:45 UTC· KMIA → KTRI· NETJETS SALES INC, BUNGALOW VENTURES LLC, CHOSEN RIVER LLC, SMIT· C68A
EJA560 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KMIA to KTRI on 2026-07-22. SkyMeter detected a long landing rollout at Tri-Cities Regional TN/VA Airport (KTRI) on runway 23 at 14:45 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1535 ft AGL, 0 kt GS. Approach stability score: 85/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 8 kt wind, 6 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A long landing rollout is detected when ground deceleration after touchdown is below the per-runway P10 envelope. It is an observational measure of rollout efficiency, not a runway-exit incident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/6747 2026-07-20 12:30Z – 2026-07-24 06:00Z SFC–2,500 ft
MAYPORT, FL, Monday, July 20, 2026 through Friday, July 24, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 23
- 1535 ft AGL at event
- 0 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 85/100
- 8 kt wind
- 6 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KTRI 161953Z 00000KT 10SM SCT043 32/19 A3034 RMK AO2 SLP246 T03170194
Flight context
- EJA560
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KMIA → KTRI
- 2026-07-22 14:45 UTC
- KTRI runway 23
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data