Go-around — SWA792
KRNO · 35L2026-07-07 03:12 UTC· KBUR → KRNO· SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO· B737
SWA792 (Southwest Airlines) was operating from KBUR to KRNO on 2026-07-07. SkyMeter detected a go-around at Reno Tahoe International Airport (KRNO) on runway 35L at 03:12 UTC. Trace data at the event: 5525 ft AGL, 182 kt GS. METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 9 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A go-around is a discontinued landing approach in which the pilot adds power and climbs back to a safe altitude before re-attempting the approach or proceeding to an alternate. It is a routine safety response, not an emergency, and is taught as the standard reaction to any unstable approach. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/4197 2026-06-01 07:00Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
GOLETA, CA, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/7842 2026-06-27 01:07Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Montecito, CA
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/7841 2026-06-29 15:07Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Goleta, CA
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 35L
- 5525 ft AGL at event
- 182 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- 10 kt wind
- 9 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KRNO 170955Z 00000KT 10SM CLR 12/03 A3004 RMK AO2 SLP128 FU HZ ALQDS T01220028
Flight context
- SWA792
- Southwest Airlines
- B737
- KBUR → KRNO
- 2026-07-07 03:12 UTC
- KRNO runway 35L
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data