Diversion — EJA423
KSUS · 08R2026-08-23 23:29 UTC· KIND → KSUS· NETJETS SALES INC, CONQUEST STUDENT HOUSING LLC, CORPORATE INVES· E55P
EJA423 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KIND to KCLT (Charlotte Douglas International Airport) on 2026-08-23. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Spirit of St Louis Airport (KSUS) on runway 08R at 23:29 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL273, turnaround area near Teutopolis, US. Approach stability score: 95/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 4 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 14,484 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/3628 2026-08-17 12:00Z – 2026-08-23 23:59Z SFC–400 ft
SAINT LOUIS, MO, Monday, August 17, 2026 through Sunday, August 23, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - AIR SHOWS/SPORTS6/5120 2026-08-21 17:00Z – 2026-08-24 02:30Z SFC–16,000 ft
Terre Haute, IN, Friday, August 21, 2026 through Monday, August 24, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 08R
- 462 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 95/100
- 4 kt wind
- 1 kt crosswind component
- 14,484 m visibility
- KSUS 170654Z AUTO 00000KT 9SM CLR 23/22 A3019 RMK AO2 SLP214 T02280217
Flight context
- EJA423
- Netjets Sales
- E55P
- KIND → KSUS
- 2026-08-23 23:29 UTC
- KSUS runway 08R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data