Diversion — CNS415
KBDR · 062026-07-28 21:55 UTC· KDAL → KBDR· STUART HYUNDAI LLC, BEARMAN JONATHAN, COWIN EQUIPMENT CO INC, DF· PC24
CNS415 (Stuart Hyundai) was operating from KDAL to KTEB (Teterboro Airport) on 2026-07-28. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Igor I Sikorsky Memorial Airport (KBDR) on runway 06 at 21:55 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL474, turnaround area near Danville, US. Approach stability score: 84/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 11 kt wind, 6 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft
NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/6848 2026-07-20 00:32Z – 2026-08-03 23:45Z SFC–3,000 ft
2NM W SHULERVILLE, SC, Monday, July 20, 2026 through Monday, August 3, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 06
- 6 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 84/100
- 11 kt wind
- 6 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KBDR 170152Z 22007KT 10SM OVC065 22/18 A3030 RMK AO2 SLP259 T02170183 $
Flight context
- CNS415
- Stuart Hyundai
- PC24
- KDAL → KBDR
- 2026-07-28 21:55 UTC
- KBDR runway 06
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data