Unstable approach — N56114
KCGZ · 232026-06-12 18:39 UTC· KCGZ → KCGZ· SHEFFIELD DUSTIN SCOTT, PORTER NIKI JO· P28R
N56114 (Sheffield Dustin Scott) was operating from KCGZ to KCGZ on 2026-06-12. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Casa Grande Municipal Airport (KCGZ) on runway 23 at 18:39 UTC. Trace data at the event: 2057 ft AGL, 98 kt GS. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 6 kt crosswind component. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/3966 2026-06-01 07:00Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Mesa, AZ, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 23
- 2057 ft AGL at event
- 98 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- 7 kt wind
- 6 kt crosswind component
Flight context
- N56114
- Sheffield Dustin Scott
- P28R
- KCGZ → KCGZ
- 2026-06-12 18:39 UTC
- KCGZ runway 23
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data