Speed exceedance — N559CB
2026-06-25 01:17 UTC· KAPA → KART· AIRCARR HOLDINGS LLC· CL60
N559CB (Aircarr Holdings) was operating from KAPA to KART on 2026-06-25. SkyMeter detected a speed exceedance at 01:17 UTC. Trace data at the event: 21710 ft AGL, 502 kt GS. METAR at the time reported 10 kt wind, 9 kt crosswind component. An overspeed flag is raised when observed indicated airspeed exceeds the aircraft type's published Vmo (maximum operating speed) or Mmo (maximum operating Mach). Compressibility-correction bugs were a major false-positive source on the E75L and CRJ9 fleets prior to April 2026; current flags use the corrected IAS calculation. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/4118 2026-06-01 04:00Z – 2026-07-21 03:59Z SFC–400 ft
CARMEL, IN, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4128 2026-06-01 04:00Z – 2026-07-21 03:59Z SFC–400 ft
WESTFIELD, IN, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/7205 2026-06-23 21:07Z – 2026-07-21 03:59Z SFC–400 ft
Carmel, IN
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/7208 2026-06-23 21:07Z – 2026-07-21 03:59Z SFC–400 ft
Westfield, IN
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- 21710 ft AGL at event
- 502 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- 10 kt wind
- 9 kt crosswind component
Flight context
- N559CB
- Aircarr Holdings
- CL60
- KAPA → KART
- 2026-06-25 01:17 UTC
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data