Diversion — NJM900

KAPF · 05

2026-04-02 19:28 UTC· KBQK KAPF· CHARTER AIRPLANE HOLDING COMPANY LLC· C680

NJM900 (Charter Airplane Holding) was operating from KBQK to KMKE (General Mitchell International Airport) on 2026-04-02. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Naples Municipal Airport (KAPF) on runway 05 at 19:28 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL343, turnaround area near Astatula, US. Approach stability score: 87/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 6 kt wind, 6 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • HAZARDS6/4875 2026-03-30 13:00Z – 2026-04-04 06:00Z SFC–2,500 ft

    20NM NW MEDFORD, OR, Friday, July 10, 2026 through Saturday, July 25, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 05
  • 8 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 87/100
  • 6 kt wind
  • 6 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • METAR KAPF 231253Z 12008KT 10SM CLR 27/24 A2996 RMK AO2 SLP142 T02670244

Flight context

  • NJM900
  • Charter Airplane Holding
  • C680
  • KBQK → KAPF
  • 2026-04-02 19:28 UTC
  • KAPF runway 05

All events on this flight

Diversion 19:28:40 UTC · KAPF runway 05 · 8 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 19:28:40 UTC · KAPF runway 05 · 8 ft AGL · 120 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KAPF