Diversion — EJA542
KHHR · 072026-06-07 21:11 UTC· KSGU → KHHR· NETJETS SALES INC, 4 WINDS INVESTMENTS INC, AS IS INVESTMENTS LL· C68A
EJA542 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KSGU to KBFI (Boeing Field King County International Airport) on 2026-06-07. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Jack Northrop Field Hawthorne Municipal Airport (KHHR) on runway 07 at 21:11 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL332, turnaround area near Sandy Valley, US. Approach stability score: 66/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 12 kt wind, 5 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/4189 2026-06-01 07:00Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Los Angeles, CA, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/6112 2026-06-07 16:00Z – 2026-06-07 23:00Z SFC–1,000 ft
LOS ANGELES, CA, Sunday, June 7, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 07
- 61 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 66/100
- 12 kt wind
- 5 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KHHR 182053Z 27011G20KT 10SM CLR 24/15 A3002 RMK AO2 SLP163 T02440150 56015 $
Flight context
- EJA542
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KSGU → KHHR
- 2026-06-07 21:11 UTC
- KHHR runway 07
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data