Diversion — EJA688
KBUF · 142026-06-07 21:19 UTC· KPVD → KBUF· NETJETS SALES INC, EVERQUINN LAND LLC, BAZZI ISSAM, MACFIN LLC, · C68A
EJA688 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KPVD to KBUF (Buffalo Niagara International Airport) on 2026-06-07. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Buffalo Niagara International Airport (KBUF) on runway 14 at 21:19 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL228, turnaround area near Oneonta, US. Approach stability score: 70/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 2 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/3955 2026-06-01 04:00Z – 2026-07-21 03:59Z SFC–400 ft
Smithfield, RI, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/3949 2026-06-01 05:00Z – 2026-07-21 04:59Z SFC–400 ft
Providence, RI, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Tuesday, July 21, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 14
- 709 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 70/100
- 7 kt wind
- 2 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KBUF 182054Z VRB06KT 10SM FEW038 FEW200 BKN270 20/10 A3022 RMK AO2 SLP234 T02000100 55000 $
Flight context
- EJA688
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KPVD → KBUF
- 2026-06-07 21:19 UTC
- KBUF runway 14
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data