Unstable approach — TKR168
KRDD · 342026-07-17 18:28 UTC· KWJF → KRDD· AERO-FLITE INC· RJ85
TKR168 (Aero-Flite) was operating from KWJF to KRDD on 2026-07-17. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Redding Municipal Airport (KRDD) on runway 34 at 18:28 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1589 ft AGL, 131 kt GS. Approach stability score: 42/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 4 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/3475 2026-03-08 09:00Z – 2026-11-01 09:59Z SFC–180 ft
BEALE AFB, CA, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/5797 2026-04-03 00:01Z – 2026-09-28 23:59Z SFC–400 ft
SACRAMENTO, CA, Thursday, April 2, 2026 through Monday, September 28, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4052 2026-06-01 07:00Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
San Jose, CA, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4054 2026-06-01 07:00Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
San Jose, CA, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4060 2026-06-01 07:00Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Oakland, CA, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4061 2026-06-01 07:00Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
BERKLEY, CA, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Tuesday, July 21, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4204 2026-06-01 07:00Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Santa Clara, CA, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/7983 2026-07-05 14:07Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
San Jose, CA
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/7984 2026-07-05 14:07Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Oakland, CA
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/7985 2026-07-05 14:07Z – 2026-07-21 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
San Jose, CA
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/4964 2026-07-12 00:13Z – 2026-07-26 03:00Z SFC–10,500 ft
3NM N LOYALTON, CA, Sunday, July 12, 2026 through Sunday, July 26, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/4978 2026-07-12 13:00Z – 2026-07-26 13:00Z SFC–10,500 ft
3NM N LOYALTON, CA, Sunday, July 12, 2026 through Sunday, July 26, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/5054 2026-07-12 14:45Z – 2026-07-26 13:00Z SFC–12,500 ft
3NM N LOYALTON, CA, Sunday, July 12, 2026 through Sunday, July 26, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 34
- 1589 ft AGL at event
- 131 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 42/100
- 4 kt wind
- 1 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KRDD 162153Z 16012G20KT 10SM CLR 27/08 A2985 RMK AO2 SLP103 T02720078
Flight context
- TKR168
- Aero-Flite
- RJ85
- KWJF → KRDD
- 2026-07-17 18:28 UTC
- KRDD runway 34
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data