Unstable approach — SWA924

SWA924 (Southwest Airlines) was operating from KLAS to KBNA on 2026-06-28. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Nashville International Airport (KBNA) on runway 31 at 03:35 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1694 ft AGL, 137 kt GS. Approach stability score: 42/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 9 kt wind, 9 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

• SECURITY6/3954 2026-06-01 00:00Z – 2026-07-20 23:59Z

  STILLWATER, OK, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• SECURITY6/3952 2026-06-01 05:00Z – 2026-07-21 04:59Z SFC–400 ft

  Stillwater, OK, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local

  View FAA NOTAM →
• SECURITY6/4119 2026-06-01 05:00Z – 2026-07-21 04:59Z SFC–400 ft

  NASHVILLE, TN, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local

  View FAA NOTAM →
• SECURITY6/4121 2026-06-01 05:00Z – 2026-07-21 04:59Z SFC–400 ft

  Nashville, TN, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local

  View FAA NOTAM →
• SECURITY6/4141 2026-06-01 05:00Z – 2026-07-21 04:59Z SFC–400 ft

  Tulsa, OK, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/8795 2026-06-17 15:00Z – 2026-06-29 04:00Z SFC–11,000 ft

  58NM S ST. GEORGE, UT, Wednesday, June 17, 2026 through Monday, June 29, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/8796 2026-06-17 15:00Z – 2026-06-29 04:00Z SFC–11,500 ft

  65NM SE CEDAR CITY, UT, Wednesday, June 17, 2026 through Monday, June 29, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9124 2026-06-18 14:00Z – 2026-07-01 04:00Z SFC–15,000 ft

  10NM N LOS ALAMOS, NM, Thursday, June 18, 2026 through Wednesday, July 1, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9269 2026-06-18 19:00Z – 2026-06-30 04:00Z SFC–11,000 ft

  39NM NW MESQUITE, NV, Thursday, June 18, 2026 through Tuesday, June 30, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9356 2026-06-20 13:00Z – 2026-07-03 04:00Z SFC–11,000 ft

  46 NM NW MESQUITE, NV, Saturday, June 20, 2026 through Friday, July 3, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9359 2026-06-20 13:00Z – 2026-07-03 04:00Z SFC–11,000 ft

  39 NM NW MESQUITE, NV, Saturday, June 20, 2026 through Friday, July 3, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9457 2026-06-21 13:00Z – 2026-07-04 04:00Z SFC–12,000 ft

  39 NM NW MESQUITE, NV, Sunday, June 21, 2026 through Saturday, July 4, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9458 2026-06-21 13:00Z – 2026-07-04 04:00Z SFC–12,000 ft

  37NM NW MESQUITE, NV, Sunday, June 21, 2026 through Saturday, July 4, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/0608 2026-06-25 13:00Z – 2026-07-09 03:00Z SFC–14,000 ft

  15NM W LOS ALAMOS, NM, Thursday, June 25, 2026 through Thursday, July 9, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data