Unstable approach — JTL604

KOMA · 14L

2026-06-06 17:57 UTC· KDEN → KOMA· BLUE FIVE LLC, JMD AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS LLC· CL60

JTL604 (Blue Five) was operating from KDEN to KOMA on 2026-06-06. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Eppley Airfield (KOMA) on runway 14L at 17:57 UTC. Trace data at the event: 2067 ft AGL, 168 kt GS. Approach stability score: 59/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 5 kt wind, 3 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 14L
  • 2067 ft AGL at event
  • 168 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 59/100
  • 5 kt wind
  • 3 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KOMA 142352Z 05008KT 10SM BKN046 BKN060 OVC200 14/08 A3010 RMK AO2 SLP195 T01440078 10167 20144 56002

Flight context

  • JTL604
  • Blue Five
  • CL60
  • KDEN → KOMA
  • 2026-06-06 17:57 UTC
  • KOMA runway 14L

All events on this flight

Unstable approach 17:57:50 UTC · KOMA runway 14L · 2,067 ft AGL · 168 kt GS
Unstable approach 17:57:50 UTC · KOMA runway 14L · 2,067 ft AGL · 168 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KOMA