Diversion — EJA931
KABI · 17R2026-03-29 19:31 UTC· KTRM → KABI· GIFFIN AERO LLC, COLLINS ANDREW J JR, COLLINS LILA SOMERS, DYNAM· C68A
EJA931 (Giffin Aero) was operating from KTRM to KSBA (Santa Barbara Municipal Airport) on 2026-03-29. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Abilene Regional Airport (KABI) on runway 17R at 19:31 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL423, turnaround area near Santa Clara, US. Approach stability score: 75/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 15 kt wind, 12,875 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/0091 2026-01-04 00:01Z – 2026-07-04 23:59Z SFC–500 ft
Coyote Wells, CA, Saturday, January 3, 2026 through Saturday, July 4, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/0092 2026-01-04 00:01Z – 2026-07-04 23:59Z SFC–500 ft
CALEXICO, CA, Saturday, January 3, 2026 through Saturday, July 4, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 17R
- 1785 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 75/100
- 15 kt wind
- 0 kt crosswind component
- 12,875 m visibility
- METAR KABI 241252Z 16006KT 8SM CLR 23/19 A3014 RMK AO2 SLP179 T02280194 $
Flight context
- EJA931
- Giffin Aero
- C68A
- KTRM → KABI
- 2026-03-29 19:31 UTC
- KABI runway 17R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data