Diversion — EJA598
KBDL · 62026-02-10 20:53 UTC· KMIA → KBDL· NETJETS SALES INC, PEFANIS HARRY, INFINITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING L· C68A
EJA598 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KMIA to KPDK (DeKalb Peachtree Airport) on 2026-02-10. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Bradley International Airport (KBDL) on runway 6 at 20:53 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL426, turnaround area near Harkers Island, US. Approach stability score: 88/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 6 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/2809 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–2,000 ft
Palm Beach, FL, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft
NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 6
- 161 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 88/100
- 6 kt wind
- 4 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KBDL 082051Z 30011G22KT 10SM FEW075 FEW100 FEW250 22/03 A2984 RMK AO2 SLP104 T02220033 53007
Flight context
- EJA598
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KMIA → KBDL
- 2026-02-10 20:53 UTC
- KBDL runway 6
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data