Rejected takeoff — EJA936

KFCM · 10R

2026-08-07 15:52 UTC· KFCM → ?· CP AVIATION LLC, DYNAMIC DEVELOPMENT INC, TILSTON KEITH, NIGEL T· C68A

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA936 (CP Aviation) had departed KFCM on 2026-08-07. SkyMeter detected a rejectedtakeoff at Flying Cloud Airport (KFCM) on runway 10R at 15:52 UTC. Trace data at the event: 875 ft AGL, 70 kt GS. METAR at the time reported 11 kt wind, 10 kt crosswind component, 12,875 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • HAZARDS6/8871 2026-07-27 14:00Z – 2026-08-09 04:00Z SFC–8,000 ft

    83NM N SPEARFISH, SD, Monday, July 27, 2026 through Sunday, August 9, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • HAZARDS6/1471 2026-08-04 14:00Z – 2026-08-19 04:00Z SFC–9,500 ft

    33NM SW BROADUS, MT, Tuesday, August 4, 2026 through Wednesday, August 19, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • HAZARDS6/2876 2026-08-07 15:28Z – 2026-08-09 04:00Z SFC–9,000 ft

    32NM S FORSYTH, MT, Friday, August 7, 2026 through Sunday, August 9, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 10R
  • 875 ft AGL at event
  • 70 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • 11 kt wind
  • 10 kt crosswind component
  • 12,875 m visibility
  • METAR KFCM 312353Z 30004KT 8SM CLR 29/16 A2988 RMK AO2 SLP111 T02890161 10317 20289 51007

Flight context

  • EJA936
  • CP Aviation
  • C68A
  • 2026-08-07 15:52 UTC
  • KFCM runway 10R

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KFCM