Return to field — N334AX
KNTD · 212026-07-29 00:18 UTC· KNTD → KNTD· HUNTER AVIATION INTERNATIONAL INC· HUNT
N334AX (Hunter Aviation International) had departed KNTD on 2026-07-29. SkyMeter detected a return to field at Point Mugu Naval Air Station (Naval Base Ventura Co) (KNTD) on runway 21 at 00:18 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL341, turnaround area near La Esperanza [Granjas Familiares], MX. Approach stability score: 41/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 0 kt wind, 11,265 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/4160 2026-02-14 08:00Z – 2026-08-15 06:59Z SFC–400 ft
Chula Vista, CA, Saturday, February 14, 2026 through Friday, August 14, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/9567 2026-07-28 16:27Z – 2026-08-02 04:00Z SFC–8,500 ft
YUCAIPA, CA, Tuesday, July 28, 2026 through Sunday, August 2, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 21
- 34137 ft AGL at event
- 488 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 41/100
- 0 kt wind
- 0 kt crosswind component
- 11,265 m visibility
- KNTD 162155Z 24010G17KT 7SM BKN040 23/17 A2997 RMK AO2 SLP150 T02330167 $
Flight context
- N334AX
- Hunter Aviation International
- HUNT
- KNTD → KNTD
- 2026-07-29 00:18 UTC
- KNTD runway 21
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data