Unstable approach — N602N
KALO · 182026-07-30 18:25 UTC· K98 → KALO· BANK OF UTAH TRUSTEE· AT6T
N602N (Bank of Utah) was operating from K98 to KALO on 2026-07-30. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Waterloo Regional Airport (KALO) on runway 18 at 18:25 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1975 ft AGL, 135 kt GS. Approach stability score: 32/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 12 kt wind, 2 kt crosswind component, 9,656 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Pilot review data
- Runway 18
- 1975 ft AGL at event
- 135 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 32/100
- 12 kt wind
- 2 kt crosswind component
- 9,656 m visibility
- KALO 170454Z AUTO 15010KT 6SM BR OVC005 19/18 A3020 RMK AO2 RAB00E17 PRESFR SLP225 P0000 T01890183 $
Flight context
- N602N
- Bank of Utah
- AT6T
- K98 → KALO
- 2026-07-30 18:25 UTC
- KALO runway 18
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data