Diversion — EJA989
KDZB · 172026-06-07 20:37 UTC· KAUS → KDZB· TEXTRON AVIATION INC· C68A
EJA989 (Textron Aviation) was operating from KAUS to KOSU (The Ohio State University Airport - Don Scott Field) on 2026-06-07. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Horseshoe Bay Resort Airpark (KDZB) on runway 17 at 20:37 UTC. Peak altitude 5,264 ft, turnaround area near The Hills, US. Approach stability score: 24/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 8 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 11,265 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/4030 2026-06-01 05:00Z – 2026-07-21 04:59Z SFC–400 ft
AUSTIN, TX, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM → - SECURITY6/4031 2026-06-01 05:00Z – 2026-07-21 04:59Z SFC–400 ft
AUSTIN, TX, Monday, June 1, 2026 through Monday, July 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 17
- 1117 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 24/100
- 8 kt wind
- 1 kt crosswind component
- 11,265 m visibility
- METAR KDZB 180955Z AUTO 00000KT 7SM CLR 21/20 A3016 RMK AO2 T02130195
Flight context
- EJA989
- Textron Aviation
- C68A
- KAUS → KDZB
- 2026-06-07 20:37 UTC
- KDZB runway 17
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data