Diversion — EJA730

KPHL · 35

2026-07-30 17:43 UTC· KFSD → KPHL· NETJETS SALES INC, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC, GREAT POINT ADVISOR· CL35

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA730 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KFSD to KCDC (Cedar City Regional Airport) on 2026-07-30. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Philadelphia International Airport (KPHL) on runway 35 at 17:43 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL433, turnaround area near Dunlap, US. Approach stability score: 85/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 0 kt wind, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/8930 2026-07-30 16:00Z – 2026-08-03 03:00Z SFC–400 ft

    Chicago, IL, Thursday, July 30, 2026 through Monday, August 3, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 35
  • 0 ft AGL at event
  • 0 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 85/100
  • 0 kt wind
  • 0 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KPHL 171954Z 19008KT 10SM SCT070 BKN100 BKN160 28/20 A3013 RMK AO2 SLP203 T02780200 $

Flight context

  • EJA730
  • Netjets Sales
  • CL35
  • KFSD → KPHL
  • 2026-07-30 17:43 UTC
  • KPHL runway 35

All events on this flight

Diversion 17:43:52 UTC · KPHL runway 35 · 0 ft AGL · 0 kt GS
Diversion 17:43:52 UTC · KPHL runway 17 · 9 ft AGL · 120 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KPHL