Diversion — EJA325
KSDL · 032026-06-28 23:22 UTC· KLAS → KSDL· NETJETS SALES INC, RLI CORP, PONDEROSA HOMES II INC, GRANITE LLC· E55P
EJA325 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KLAS to KFLG (Flagstaff Pulliam Airport) on 2026-06-28. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Scottsdale Airport (KSDL) on runway 03 at 23:22 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL262, turnaround area near Bagdad, US. Approach stability score: 55/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 9 kt wind, 5 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- HAZARDS6/8795 2026-06-17 15:00Z – 2026-06-29 04:00Z SFC–11,000 ft
58NM S ST. GEORGE, UT, Wednesday, June 17, 2026 through Monday, June 29, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/0842 2026-06-26 14:00Z – 2026-07-09 03:00Z SFC–10,500 ft
13NM SW FLAGSTAFF, AZ, Friday, June 26, 2026 through Thursday, July 9, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - HAZARDS6/1244 2026-06-28 21:00Z – 2026-07-12 04:00Z SFC–10,500 ft
13NM SW FLAGSTAFF, AZ, Sunday, June 28, 2026 through Sunday, July 12, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 03
- 1507 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 55/100
- 9 kt wind
- 5 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KSDL 312353Z VRB05KT 10SM CLR 31/17 A2992 RMK AO2 SLP107 T03110172 10311 20250 56029
Flight context
- EJA325
- Netjets Sales
- E55P
- KLAS → KSDL
- 2026-06-28 23:22 UTC
- KSDL runway 03
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data