Go-around — JBU891
KTPA · 01L2025-12-26 14:01 UTC· KBOS → KTPA· JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP· A320
JBU891 (Jetblue Airways) was operating from KBOS to KTPA on 2025-12-26. SkyMeter detected a go-around at Tampa International Airport (KTPA) on runway 01L at 14:01 UTC. Trace data at the event: 236 ft AGL, 137 kt GS, 0 fpm vertical. Approach stability score: 90/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 1 kt wind, 16,093 m visibility. A go-around is a discontinued landing approach in which the pilot adds power and climbs back to a safe altitude before re-attempting the approach or proceeding to an alternate. It is a routine safety response, not an emergency, and is taught as the standard reaction to any unstable approach. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY5/2811 2025-10-20 12:00Z – 2026-10-20 12:00Z SFC–1,000 ft
NEW YORK, NY, Monday, October 20, 2025 through Tuesday, October 20, 2026 Local
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 01L
- 236 ft AGL at event
- 137 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 90/100
- 1 kt wind
- 0 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- METAR KTPA 241253Z 03009G16KT 10SM BKN010 25/22 A3000 RMK AO2 SLP157 T02500222
Flight context
- JBU891
- Jetblue Airways
- A320
- KBOS → KTPA
- 2025-12-26 14:01 UTC
- KTPA runway 01L
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data